Texas Take ‘Em – A Lesson in Vampire Politics
October 22, 2010 in Character & Plot Analysis, Dead in the Family - Book 10, Guest Posts
Alright, so summer is gone and True Blood is over – which means class is back in session! Drag out your copies of the Sookie Stackhouse Novels, we are hitting the books!
First up on the agenda – a look at vampire politics as recounted by Eric in Dead in the Family, and its implications for the upcoming Sookie Stackhouse Companion and book 11, Dead Reckoning. To which I say, finally, I can use my degree towards something!
“As my wife, you must know this.” (p 154)
Dusting off our memories if we can, let’s go back to that clunky chapter where Eric gave Sookie the lowdown on the vampire political system. To summarize for those who don’t have their books on hand, previously Eric had snuck into the hidey-hole the night before while Hunter slept in the guest room, Sookie explains Claude and Hunter’s presence in the house, Eric then tells Sookie he has to give her the 411 – and no, he was not Leif Ericson.
On the first reading, the sheer bluntness and excessiveness of Eric’s delivery of so much information that he felt would help Sookie “negotiate the minefield of vampire politics” (153) was off-putting. Why this? Why this now? It seemed like Charlaine Harris lobbed this at her readers on a late edit. The chapter seemed odd and ill fitting, and it certainly didn’t appear to belong in the narrative, since the rest of the book focused so much on the theme of family and all but completely abandoned the political thereafter. But Eric was trying to tell Sookie important stuff, (by the Hammer of Thor, really I mean it!), and upon closer examination, Harris told us more than I originally expected to find.
Part of the difficulty we encounter drawing the message from this passage is due to Sookie’s narration – her growing impatience and the readers’ own anticipation ( *drool* ) amplify with every mention of mind-blowing, sex, and Eric. Redundant much, CH?
As difficult as it is to not fantasize where the Gracious Plenty is concerned, I suggest on your rereading that you try to block out the distracting sexual subtext, and hold those lady boners in. Think of the kittens Ewoks.
Haha, MAS. I borrowed your joke there. (But added Ewoks. *shifty eyes.*)
STAY ON TARGET… STAY ON TARGET!
Returning to the lesson, Eric and Sookie banter on for about 3 pages with the Amun, Narayana, Zeus, and Moshup delineations, – to which I say nuhuh, hit the ignore button please. The mythology behind these terms is unimportant. Scratch ‘em off the study guide for now. Amun. Narayana. Zeus. Moshup. In test prep terminology, these new vampire territories are “attractive distractors” and are equally distracting as the GP. Sookie perked up when she heard them and feigned interest real well, but the backstory of these ‘stupid names’ is not relevant to where I think the story is going. If you put “Narayana created the sun from his eyes” down on the test later as the #1 important thing in this passage, you will fail.
Just sayin.’
These are not the bombs in the garden you’re looking for.
IGNORANCE WILL KEEL YOU
While this will make a snazzy poster for any of you politicos planning on attending a rally this year, does it have anything to do with Amun. Narayana. Zeus. Moshup, these proper nouns of themselves? Hmm. Not that much.
“I think you need to know what’s going on around you, my lover.” Eric had never looked more serious. “Last night, while I was working, I found myself distracted by the idea that you might suffer for your ignorance. Pam agreed. She’s wanted to give you the background of our hierarchy for some weeks. But I thought the knowledge would burden you, and you had enough problems to handle. Pam reminded me that ignorance could get you killed. I value you too much to let yours continue.” (p 157)
Eric expresses concern for Sookie’s safety here – if we invert it, how could any of the information in this chapter be helpful in saving her life?
Going back a few pages while looking for ideas, I stumbled on a land mine. While explaining the political landscape and the mechanics of vampire governance, the Viking gave Sookie a serendipitous warning. That is, Eric told her where NOT to go. Eeeeerp. What? Jar Jar Binks, play that back again.
Meesa say, Eric told her where not to go.
“Stan’s lieutenant in Texas has struggled these past few months since Stan was injured in Rhodes, and it’s been hard for him to hold on to Texas.” (p 155)
Texas.
Which is ripe for a take over.
Texas.
Which is where Sam’s brother’s wedding is located.
WRIGHT ROH, RAGGY!
In order to get to Wright, Texas,** Sam and Sookie must go through the Dallas-Texas territory. Blurgh! Will Sam and Sookie make a stopover in Dallas or avoid it all together and take an alternative route? Will Eric freak when he finds out Sookie plans to go to Craig’s wedding but for her only to misconstrue what he is saying as jealousy and mistrust instead of tactical advice? And will she go ahead with attending this out of spite and her independent zeal?
**Apparently there are two Wright, Texases. I chose the one that is closer to Louisiana, but both are west of Dallas.
While I’m certainly trying hard not to panic over this newish layer of intrigue, I think it only spells trouble. Will the ‘takeover’ happen before or after Craig’s wedding? Will Dallas be ground zero of a battle for control of the state? Will news of it trickle to Sookie’s ears while she is there? Will someone make an attempt to kidnap Sookie once she enters that area? Regardless, I do not think it is a coincidence where this wedding is located. Harris has a purpose for this.
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US.
Now if California is split into thirds because of population density according to Eric, then the Texas territory might be split at least in half, right? And for all intents and purposes we are talking about the northern half of Texas, which includes the Dallas area and which I believe must include the surrounding areas like Fort Worth. Although who knows, maybe Texas is one whole territory? Overall it could be a relatively moot point, but the focus here is Dallas.
As of right this minute, I am going out on a limb and saying Texas WILL be taken over.
It is only a matter of WHEN.
But I won’t stop there. Pushing all my chips in, I also say Texas will be taken over by Oklahoma’s Queen Freyda, and NOT Felipe De Castro’s Nevada regime.
Why Oklahoma you ask?
First we know FDC is busy attempting to pry Mississippi away from Russell Edgington, which we learned from Pam in the short story “Two Blondes.” This would make Oklahoma’s blitz of Dallas more likely, since they know Nevada is still trying to expand and thus they will have a bigger sense of urgency.
Geographically speaking, Oklahoma would be walled in on three sides if the Felipe De Castro regime were to claim Texas – since this regime already have full control of Arkansas and Louisiana. I doubt Oklahoma will allow themselves to be surrounded to that degree, and I believe they will make a preemptive strike.
Also, a hypothetical alliance with Eric won’t be of much consequence if Freyda doesn’t command a powerful regime herself. A weak ally is a non-ally.
Here’s lookin’ at you, Alderaan.
FREYDA: HOW DO YOU PRONOUNCE THAT?
This is killing me, I keep tripping all over that j. Fray-da? Free-da?
My research yielded the spelling is likely Russian or Polish and the name means “Peace” or “Peaceful leader.” Is Freyda possibly some old friend of Eric’s? An old flame?
“Freyda” appears to be Scandinavian in origin, and quite close to both Freya and Freyja – the Norse goddess of love, fertility and war. This could very well be a big fat hint of a long standing, past connection between her and Eric – either going back to their human days (a stretch) or simply a connection forged out of a shared Nordic heritage (more likely).
Will Eric approach Freyda looking for help to extricate Nevada and pledge his loyalty to her in exchange for the Queenship of Louisiana? Or instead, will friendly Freyda want a nice neighbor, take cash in small bills, and permit Eric the Kingship of his own state?
I’ll have more on a potential alliance later, but in the meantime why is a Texas takeover so important?
BYE BYE STANLEY!
We hardly knew ye.
Mr. Davis is deader than dead in my opinion. There is an off chance that Freyda may allow Stan to live in a non-hostile takeover and/or marries him in lieu of killing him outright, but I doubt it since Oklahoma has their back up against the wall. Well.. technically three walls.
“If we’re weak enough to be taken, then we are fair game.” (p 155)
With Stan gone, what does this mean for Barry Bellboy? Is he still in Stan’s employ? Would he then belong to Freyda? Will Barry leave the state before this goes down? Did he go into hiding after Rhodes? Was he ensnared by Lattesta & the G-Men or enslaved by Victor Madden, who is jealous of Eric’s little telepathic trump card?
Lemon hears people’s thoughts too. Should she be worried?
QUINN
John is supposed to be in the new novella and we know that this wedding Sookie has promised to attend is in Texas, so is there a connection? Is he there in his unofficial capacity as Traitor-in-Chief while spying for FDC on the Supes in Texas? Is the rest of the Nevada gang far behind? Is Frannie there too? Is Quinn stalking Sookie? Is he standing right over the border waiting for Sookie since he can’t step foot into Eric’s area? Has he finally given up pit-fighting and joined the circus?
It seems fairly certain that one final wedge will be driven between Quinn and Sookie to put that mess to bed forever, hence his reappearance in the novella. The tiger’s track record on choosing sides is nothing to write home about, and his habit of leading trouble straight to Sookie doesn’t bode well, either.
FELICIA
That dead little spy that Alexei annihilated at the end of DITF belonged to someone. Who dat? I’ll be damned if it isn’t Freyda. Since I think Stan is dead vamp walking, it doesn’t serve the story much if Felicia was in his employ, but rather if it was Freyda potentially she will send another minion to enquire about Felicia’s disappearance, and she could bring charges of wrongful death against Eric, since he was responsible for her as a vampire in his area. There is a lot of explaining to do to somebody on that front.
And what information did Bobby Burnham possibly pass along to her during their dirty little fling?
The likely implications of Felicia’s presence are that Freyda knows the situation in Louisiana from her reconnoissance, she knows that Eric is under Felipe De Castro’s thumb, and she will demand payment in some kind if she is to offer aid – regime toppling isn’t free last time I checked and payment via an alliance with Louisiana would have to seem mighty attractive to her vulnerable state. Who knows – if she is a connection of Eric’s, maybe she will offer it at a reduced price?
“THE SENATOR”
Shortly after the geography lesson and the mind blowing sex (which we the readers were not allowed to witness in dripping graphic detail. Nerds!!!), Sookie starts acting weird due to Appius’ arrival and the stressed blood bond. She blurts out this:
“Hey, I heard on the radio today that one of the senators from Oklahoma came out as a Were. He said he’d register with some government bureau the day they pried his fangs from his cold, dead corpse.” (p 161)
Does this Were-Senator have any bearing on the state of Oklahoma’s vampire hierarchy since the human government is starting to merge Vampire Affairs with Supe Affairs? Why did CH drop this? Was it supposed to be some random inconsequential fact? Why mention Oklahoma twice in the same chapter? Especially when this new character Freyda looks to be rather important if she is the “new Queen on the board” from the Dead Reckoning synopsis and that this Were-Senator holds an anti-registration stance. This may be in the long run irrelevant, but color me intrigued.
AMUN! NARAYANA! ZEUS! MOSHUP!
Okay, we can discuss their geographical relevance now. Oklahoma belongs in Zeus if Texas does and they share the common vertical dividing line, so most likely Zeus will support Oklahoma’s plan in solidifying inter-Clan power structures, especially in light of Felipe de Castro’s growing dominion.
So what does it mean if Oklahoma becomes a Louisiana ally, since it will be across Clan lines and not internally within Amun?
Amun has been decimated from the bombing of the last summit, so that makes them poor and self-serving and in my opinion they do not care about Eric’s troubles in so much their own. There is not going to be an army of droids help coming from his own Clan, Eric has to look somewhere else for aid.
Which brings me to wonder how many marriages are allowed between Kings and Queens outside of their respective Clan. Eric seems to suggest marriage does not need to be inside the Clan when he recalls the summit:
“There are visitors at the summits, if they have some vested interest in a topic under discussion. Or they are engaged in a lawsuit against someone in that division. Or if they’re going to marry someone in the division whose time it is to have a summit.” (p 155)
The evidence in the Sookieverse suggests otherwise however; Sophie-Anne married Arkansas, which was internally within Amun, and Russell married King Bartlett of Indiana, again, internally within Amun.
Based on this, marriage and ‘peaceful’ alliances across Clan lines may occur, but don’t appear to be common.
PLEASE PUSH THE PANIC BUTTON… NOW!
Marriage as a means to form an alliance between Oklahoma and Louisiana seems pretty likely. Shark farts! With the example of Sophie-Anne and Peter Threadgill it was made clear a marriage of convenience does not have to be consummated, heck they don’t even have to like each other. Could Eric marry Freyda and have Sookie as a consort? Will Eric be forced to ask Sookie for a divorce? (Please CH – god, no!) Does Eric perform the matrimonial services at his own wedding? HAHAHA.
Oh, fudge buckets. I’m crapping my pants over this.
Can Eric form an alliance with Oklahoma without marriage being a necessary component? I have no frakking idea how it will play out. All I do know is Felipe De Castro and Victor Madden aren’t walking out that door of their own free will, which to me can only mean one thing.
This is war, Peacock.
To be continued…







Serena!!! This post is made of WIN! By the way, I’ll never forgive you for the quote in the SVM Quote game: “As my wife you must know this”! Hahahahaha! Now I get it! Hahaha!
Thanks VL! SVB helped quite a bit with the editing and she made the Clan map.
So my thanks to you SVB!
Oh yeah that quote was a total cheapie.
you really gave a great thought on the subject. My brain hurts, I do not know if I’m capable of a coherent response. As to possible marriage, I thought anything like this could happen, when they mentioned the “new queen on the board ‘, but I refused to think about it either. is definitely a possibility … but I think Eric gives you value for wedding with Sookie, as he demonstrated throughout DITF (you’re my wife, and the only way that matters to me). That’s why I always hated the idea of Eric being King!
If he wants a divorce to Sookie (is that possible?), Is the end, Sookie will never accept this agreement. the end.
ohh you really gave that some thought! I’m quite intrigued! Oklahoma is my home state and of course of some interest to me when mentioned by CH in her books, but I just didn’t put two and two together. Now I’m really dying for the next book and I have such a LONG wait. In the mean time I look forward to more predictions. Great job!
Great catch on the Sam/Texas wedding connection! You’re right, none of this is a coincidence and it’s bad news that Quinn will be at that wedding. Or maybe he’ll do something good and give Sookie some inside information – although I doubt it since he hates Eric and would probably prefer to see Eric taken out by FDC or Victor. I also wonder where Eric asking Sookie to become a vampire, or at least the convo in general, fits into all of this.
I definitely think Eric has been making some serious moves. I wonder if Felicia was actually acting as a liason on behalf of Freyda instead of as a spy for her? I always found it odd that Eric would allow her to visit his home when he never ever let any of his staff (other than Barry) visit him. Do you think that’s a possibility?
I don’t know if Freyda was sending Felicia as a liaison instead of a spy, I feel like Eric would have called her that or that he would have been sure who she belonged to…, but it may have been like, “oh she is a spy for my old friend, so it isn’t a big deal” type thing maybe? Eric was sort of friendly with Stan too, so that might not have been a huge issue to Eric either. It might be a clue that there is something more to it when he only suggested she belonged to either Stan and Freyda. IDK. Shrug.
There is a bit of a conflict there though, if Felicia was Freyda’s (and Freyda actually cares about Felicia’s death), how do they overcome that obstacle to even broach the subject of an alliance? That is probably where money comes in, – I think we have to root for Freyda to have known Eric previously, she could more easily accept his explanation and might be willing to help him, .. at cost. Lol.
My mind is blown! That is a great analysis, Serena. I need to pull my head out of my ass and read DITF again, because I missed all that. Chapter 7, with all the vampire politics, was very dry, and I had a hard time getting through it. Thank you for deciphering it. Next time I read it, I’ll have a frackin clue, and read it with respect instead of thinking, blah, blah, when are they going to get it on?
I’m speechless,she made clear to Quinn,she wants to be number one in the relationship,she will not accept this arrangement.
Wow, amazing, will Eric have to leave Sookie to protect her from the new Queen.
I hate to even ask this but what a coincidence about the wedding, do you think Sam has something to do with this?!?
{…do you think Sam has something to do with this?!?}
There just seem to be so many implications about Sam! I feel as though we’re heading towards a culmination of something – like all players are going to be exposed at the end: Sam, Quinn, FDC, VM, etc.
Sam has always been iffy but I’m not sure he would put Sookie in harms way. However, he always seems to know EVERYTHING so I feel like he must know what’s been going on some level. I’m so on the fence about Sam now…or maybe he will just be an innocent bystander in all of this?
Crap! I can’t wait for the companion book now!!
It was the first thing that came to mind when reading this, i hate to think Sam would set her up, but what if he was forced to.
I just went back to the Dead Reckoning Synopsis
“Sookie witnesses the firebombing of Merlotte’s, the bar where she works. Since Sam Merlotte is now known to be two-natured, suspicion falls immediately on the anti-shifters in the area. But Sookie suspects otherwise and she and Sam work together to uncover the culprit – and the twisted motive for the attack”
Just been talking about this over on facebook, and HELL YES, my Sam-DAR is going off again.
Can’t help but think he might know this attempt on Texas is coming – it was always odd that he knew about the Nevada takeover by the time Sookie got to work the following morning…literally hours after it went down, and Sookie hadn’t spoken to him.
I don’t think he’d necessarily drop Sookie in it, or that he’s setting her up but it just seems like he KNOWS. Why does he always just “KNOW” all this shit??
Ugh Sam drives me MENTAL.
Yup, i agree! That was me on FB
Oh so it is! I’m sure I talk to the same people there and here and I don’t even realise half the time LOL!
There is more than meets the eye with Sam. I have wondered how he knew about the state being taken over when they are not fond of vampires. I know there is a shifter website they use to share things but knowing so much about vamp politics seems shifty to me. Unless someone besides Russell has weres and shifters in their employ? Hmmmm….food for thought!
oh, dammit serena! D:
lol
Sweet almight Vikings in Valhalla. Me thinks you nailed it!
P.S. I’m crapping my pants, too, and biting nails…even the ones on my toes.
It’s posts like these that make me love this site and everyone here even more!
People really should give CH more credit cause she definatly plants a LOT of bombs but without giving her plot away. I love you so much for digging through all the hints and doing the mental connections. Cause I doubt I would have come up with half this info even if I had re-read that chapter a dozen times.
Though now you’ve raised a lot of questions and I’m a tad scared for our poor Sookie. And the idea of Eric having to marry Oklahoma for an allience is truly terrifying. But either way I’m so grateful to have this site and the insanely savy folks here.
Hi. I cant remember if u wrote this but Freda also means powerful ruler and blessed reconciliation in welsh.
Thanks for that, ETL. I had a hard time researching the name, it was major Google fail and the spelling drives me so nuts! I hate to even look at it.
Thanks Serena and SVB for feeding my obsession for the Sookie novels and giving us this fabulous home! As usual, I don’t have any answers, but I do have questions;)
First, although I hated “Two Blondes” we (and Eric) know that Victor, assumed on FDC’s behalf, is also interested in Mississippi. FDC’s power grab is cutting across clan lines and I have to think that the clans themselves should eventually be wondering if they don’t have a vested interest in reigning in FDC’s expansion ambitions before he becomes “King of the South”.
I can also see Freya sending Felicia to spy on Victor and to see if Eric can be convinced to help Oklahoma (maybe Texas and Mississippi also?)in providing intel against FDC in exchange for autonomy.
I can’t see why Freya would want to marry Eric though. What would she get out of it? I can’t see Eric wanting a political marriage either unless it was absolutely unavoidable for their safety because he would know how Sookie would perceive it.
I think Sam may want Sookie at the wedding to “listen” to someone only because it would even out the HEA playing field since Sam would be *using* Sookie’s talents and keeping material information from her, but that might just be wishful thinking {sigh}
You’re welcome!
I wouldn’t be surprised if we hear about other power grabs too. Moshup might be getting into the mix as well and taking over right and left. I think what has happened in Louisiana is just a microcosm of what has been going on. All the states weakened by the bombing in Rhodes are at risk IMO.
Yeah, you’re right, it is Sam’s turn to ‘use’ Sookie. LMAO!!
A neighbour who isn’t power hungry – we have been told repeatedly that Eric only wants enough power to give him the freedom to live as he wants. It’s likely that if in control of LA, Eric would have no desire to expand his territory just for the sake of it.
When the alternative is FDC – who has proven beyond doubt that he is on a mission to acquire territory and will just continue to do so – I know who I’d rather be cosied up with.
And if, as we think, there is some sort of past connection between Eric and Freyda then it’s also a case of better the devil you know…and all that jazz.
Wow, great post Serena! So many things to think about, like the mention of Texas being weak and the fact that Sam’s brother’s wedding will be in Texas. I had not even made that connection.
The possibility of an Eric/Freya vampire marriage is also something that had not occurred to me. Now I will worry about it. Thanks, btw.
It’s a definite possibility, especially now that I recall Bruno saying something to Sookie about Eric being busy amassing a power base that was making Victor uncomfortable. That could definitely include Freya and the support that she would bring. I wonder if the possibility of this marriage for alliances’ sake will play any part in why Eric will ask Sookie to turn.
Thank you VD! (and everyone!
) Ever since I first read DITF I’ve been obsessed with that chapter, I knew there had to be something there, lol. I pieced the Texas-wedding-takeover connection together last week though. I think a reason it didn’t pop earlier was Sam only used the word ‘Wright’ in DITF but we definitely know his family lives in Texas from DAG. I then went to find what Eric said about Stan again, because I remembered he mentioned him in that chapter. I then put it in my GPS on my phone, and it hit me like a ton of bricks. Tricksie Charlaine Harris is.
Sorry, I didn’t mean to upset everybody. LOL. Lets put it this way, I think marriage as a means to an alliance is on the table, as is cash, as is the control of the state. I don’t think Eric can have it all. … and I hate to add this, but it may be a better alternative to marriage,.. Sookie’s telepathic services might be on the negotiating table too. (especially if Freyda doesn’t score Barry).
As for Eric’s growing power, I have some ideas to kick around on that in part 2.
I am at work right now and so don’t have my books with me but wasn’t there some mention in ATD about vampire marriages between monarchs requiring a certain number of visits per year? Were these necessarily conjugal visits? I can’t recall. I don’t see conjugal visits sitting well with Sookie. I do think that you are on to something here though in light of the specific mention of a “new Queen” in the book blurb.
While it will certainly cause angst if it plays out this way, it will be interesting to see how Sookie will react if she perceives a possible rival as far as Eric goes. As far as I can recall there has never been much of an instance where Sookie has been faced with Eric potentially having some interest in another woman (his “chocolate factory” attraction to Claudine notwithstanding). Might this possible jealousy, or even just her anger that Eric would even consider a political marriage (b/c she will likely see it as devaluing his and hers relationship) be the final impetus that gets to break the BB?
I look forward to reading your thoughts in your next piece. In the meantime I will be re-reading that chapter of DITF with all this new speculation in mind.
Viking Dame, I just reread that one, and yes they say something like once every hundred years or something like that. They talk about it when they perform the wedding ceremony at the summit. I guess I should go whip out my book to see what the exact wording was.
Hehe.. I’ve been meaning to look that up again, *shameface for not looking it up beforehand.* LOL.
Sigh, I don’t see it sitting well with Sookie either, but that doesn’t mean they can’t work through it or who knows maybe the potential marriage thing is an unwarranted fear? I’m just thinking the only precedent of alliances in the books are either love-match marriages, marriages of convenience, or hostile takeovers. There could be something else, definitely.
I’m convinced we will see Sookie jealous of another female before the story is finished, whether it is Freyda or Eric’s other child.
Eric has another child? Did I miss something?
Yup, he does.
Pam mentions her in passing when she is talking to Sookie in ATD. This is the quote, which is Pam’s response to Sookie’s question about why Eric turned her:
“I think he was lonely.” she said, a faint note of surprise in her voice. “His last companion had struck out on her own, since children can’t stay with their maker for long. After a few years, the child must strike out on its own, though it may come back to the maker, and must if the maker calls.”
Harris has said she doesn’t know if EOC will enter the narrative, but the way I see it Eric needs all hands on deck, why wouldn’t he call on her? I think we will meet this chick before all is said and done, unless we already have and didn’t know it?
Thanks, Serena. I totally missed that one. If EOC is half as awesome as Pam she will be a great addition to the family. Speaking of which, People’s Choice Awards are conducting their polls right now and there is a write in campaign in the Best TV Family for Eric and Pam.
His oldest child might be the Queen and if Eric’s children are Queens than Eric has the power over them and they have to listen to him.
The marriage lasts for 100 years and they have to visit each other at least once a year, methinks.
Love the post Serena,you gave me a lot to think about now. Im so happy with this site.also foun this: Freya
Goddess of Love and Fertility
Moon Goddess and wife/lover of Odin. Also commander of the Valkyries. Freya is the goddess of erotic and sensual love. She is the twin sister of Frey. She weeps tears of gold. She is generous, passionate and exuberant and expects the same of those who would honor her.
–~–
, going to read this chapt now.
omigod Serena!!! great insight! and looooooved your predictions
1. “a new queen” as the synopsis said… You might be onto something…!
2. great catch on the Sam’s brother wedding and the need to travel trought texas!
and tks for the map! as a portuguese all these states and affairs were totally lost on me! but now i have a better understanding about the US borders!:)
IF I HAD A GONG I WOULD BANG IT.
Because, you know, there are no words for your supreme awesomeness. I laughed… I cried… and I puzzled over how I will explain to my firstborn that Endor is no more, and it’s all Mommy’s fault.
I salute you, Serena. And I think you totally hit the nail on the head. My money’s on Sookie being kidnapped en route to the wedding– which she attends in spite of Eric’s warnings. INTRIGUE!
Oh, and I really wish you hadn’t raised the prospect of a political marriage between Freyda and Eric. Because this also sounds frighteningly possible, and I DO NOT LIKE.
Thanks MAS, coming from you that means a lot.
… ya know cuz I worship at your altar. lol. Can I quote you on that?
So you’re the one responsible! Hmmpf. … Poor Wicket never had a chance.
Yeah that cover of the companion looks rather ominous now, like Sookie and Sam are fleeing from the bats that are representative of their vampiric pursuers, and there are quite a few of them. GAH!.
Re: the potential for an Eric-Freyda marriage, I tried to hush it all up but SVB wouldn’t let me.
In the early going I was like “yeah, but thats just a slight possibility, moving on” but noooo, we had to go to there.
Ha! This ALL YOUR can of worms, baby!
You opened it, you suffer the consequences!
PFFFFFFFFFT.
(Damn, passing the buck and blaming SVB always works! Why isn’t it working this time! Must consult the playbook.. )
I think it’s very possible. When Eric tells sookie that she is his wife in the only way that matters to me… IMO he was conveying to her that there is a major possibility that he will have to marry this queen freyda, but it’s just business. It doesnt matter to him. He’s begging her to understand this. But knowing sookie she didn’t understand the message and she’s gonna go batshit crazy about it.
yeah, that line certainly seems significant in light of all this.
Love the new post Serena, so glad to have something new to ponder during this miserable wait! I agree with MAS, I think Sookie will be kidnapped on the way to the wedding as well.
Do we know if the wedding will occur during the book or the novella? I’m thinking it is the book, but I can’t remember.
I am just re-reading FDTW, and now I keep thinking that Niall has some connection with Victor or FDC? I just have the feeling after what Dermot told us (Sookie) in DITF, that there is more to Niall than meets the eye, and we will see him again in some form in the next book.
Serena…dude…BEYOND awesome! The Eric-Freyja marriage seems so likely when you lay it all out like that. Goddamn…
I so need to go back and re-read DITF…STAT!
Thank you Serena
this was really thought provoking. It’s going to be a very exciting book I think. But it could also very well mean the end of S/E relationship alas
Wow Serena! You’re so smart! It’s fascinating. Thanks for the analysis!
Great Post Serena….I am off to read DiTF again, with your theories as my frame of reference. I have read it twice and must admit that I was so focused on E/S relationship that I didn’t really take in much of the subtext. I can go and reread now with a whole new perspective. Thanks!
Thanks Serena for a very thought provoking article. I will have to read this chapter again from a new perspective. I hope that you are wrong about Eric and a royal marriage. It would kill Sookie. I want him to stay with the Sook and make her his Queen when he takes over the two southern states.
However, Eric and Sookie could have a huge fight over her going to the wedding with Sam and, while semi-broken up, he makes the alliance with Oklahoma.In retaliation, Sookie (almost?)gets it on with Sam (God, I can’t believe I just said that—had to insert the “almost” to wipe the visual from my mind. I should have thought of “soggy diapers and maggots” instead). I am so fearful that CH will have Sookie end up with Sam just for the sake of the children. I also think the tiger striped suiter will figure in the intrigue somewhere…he’s not done with Sookie yet.
Cannot wait for Part 2!
Sookie to Appius, DITF -
And later in DITF, Eric to Sookie:
So what the fuckity fuck was Appius doing in Oklahoma of all places – and why has he come STRAIGHT from there to land back in Eric’s life, all outta the blue?
Appius’ little jaunt to Oklahoma and Eric’s “unwelcome business” just have to be connected.
I’m even more scared of my theory now. *runs and hides.*
Hmm, but this does mean Freyda has met Alexei if ALO was visiting her. Maybe he had one of his ‘fits’ there, so she knows what Appius was dealing with, and will ‘buy’ Eric’s story about Felicia’s death?
That might explain Eric allowing Felicia over to his house, and he most likely contacted Freyda after he flew back if he knew who she belonged to.
AND this means Eric already has the offer, whatever it is. *brain whirling.*
Unwelcome business is that Appius was thinking of putting his youngest child down because he was serial killer.
Urk! And at the end of the book Appius told Sookie that she wouldn’t keep Eric and he seemed pretty sure about it.
Gak! I’m still shuddering about the thought of Eric marrying someone who isn’t Sookie! Serena, you’re killing me with your brilliant twisted mind!
I don’t know how we’re expected to last until May — does anyone know the exact release date?
As a ignorant non-American who cannot identify all 50 states on a map (okay, I did it once in Grade 5, but quickly forgot it again), why is Nevada in western US picking on Louisiana and her surrounding neighbors in southeastern US? It seems like there are a lot of states in between. Whenever I play Risk, I like to have my countries connected.
Awesome post Serena! So many things seem to make sense now. In DITF, page 245, this quote raised some serious red flags with me: “I love you.” Eric said in a drained voice. “And you are my wife, in the only way that matters to me.” I couldn’t agree more about the political marriage between Eric and some monarch and it makes total sense that it would be the Queen of Oklahoma. I don’t like where I think this is heading!
I see no reason to panic, is just a guess, a theory, I refuse to panic until we have something more concrete. of course it would make sense a political marriage, I do not it strange that there is something to that effect, but then expect that Eric accepted (so if he is the King some day) is far away. I see this quote from Eric, a statement that he takes commitment very seriously with Sookie, that and every time he called Sookie my wife in the DITF.
Great job, Serena! I love reading all the potential outcomes.
I have to say, I am Team Eric all the way. The thought that Sookie will be off dilly dallying around with Sam irks me. Especially since she and Eric have this “bond”-whether it be blood or something else. And listen, I know Eric is all about power and yadda yadda, but would he really, REALLY, marry another vampire when he acts as if his marriage to Sookie is so sacred to him? Even for more power? I just don’t know if I can wrap my mind around it. Or maybe I don’t want too……..hmm.
Do you think he could be giving Sookie all this information on the Clan Divisions to prepare her for his takeover of a terrority? Or is that wishful thinking?
Just want to say since I stumbled onto this blog, my TB/Sookie needs are being satiated!I love all the discussions and pictures (esp. of ASkars, yummy, anyone?). So, thank you, for keeping fans like myself content until the next book/season!!
Ditto on keeping my addiction fed. Thanks to you all!!!
i’m having a hard time with the concept of uh, possible vampire divorce?
Me too Feathah. Could it be so simple as walking around a table backwards or some other lame symbolic gesture? I think we just don’t know enough to say its not possible, or to rule out polygamy even. Sigh, I wish we could ask CH about it, I can’t wait forever to find out. Lol.
I really don’t see this as any different to the way various monarchies viewed marriage in the middle ages. Clearly, the vampire political system of these novels is based on a monarchist model, what with the kings and queens, kingdoms etc.
Marriages for political convenience were common amongst this crowd, and we’ve already seen through QSA and Threadgill that a union for purely political purposes is not out of the question, and that union didn’t seem to raise so much as an eyebrow. I don’t think it a stretch at all for Eric to marry for political gain, but to continue his relationship with Sookie as his “true” emotional connection. Monarchs used to do this shit all the time – marry for convenience while their heart was somewhere else. The term “consort” was invented for this reason
WRT to the polygamy question – I agree Serena, we don’t have enough information yet. The question, really, is whether or not it would be considered polygamy for Eric to marry a human, and then another vampire. All we know about how S/E’s current marriage is viewed under vampire law is that no other vampire can touch Sookie. But she is still a human, after all, and therefore generally viewed as lesser than another vampire.
I can’t imagine that there would be no capacity for divorce under vampire law – after all, they live forever and that’s a freakin’ long time. Presumably, this is the reason that marriages are only binding for 100 years. There has to be an out.
Oh, Serena! tsk, tsk. Some thoughts should not be put into writing. Now I’m scared shitless that Eric is going to be forced into a marriage with Oklahoma. I have always assumed that Sookie’s inappropriate trip with Sam to his brother’s wedding was not only going to hurt Eric but would also be the cause of her getting into some sort of major trouble, but I just can’t handle the thought of Eric having to marry someone else because that would surely end their relationship. I suppose it’s possible that Sookie going to the bloody wedding starts a chain of events that directly leads to Eric being forced to enter into this political marriage, in which case I will be able to blame her and I’ll take it much better if it happens that way.
First of all – WOW! Serena, you have given me so very much to think of! Don’t get me wrong, I did enjoy DITF to a certain extent but I did feel at the time that it was simply “treading water” and was possibly laying the groundwork for the next novel being a return to more exciting form, You have given me reason to be more excited about the upcoming SVM book than I had before!
Also, good catch by SVB about Appius having come from Oklahoma, and may I throw another possibility about an Eric/Freya connection… So far we know of only TWO of Appius Livis Ochella’s children, Eric and Alexei, but it seems highly unlikely that someone as massively ancient as Appius would have only sired two progeny during his long un-life. Judging by his tastes its also unlikely (in my mind) that he would have chosen to sire a female as his companion BUT! What if one of his previous, now finally dead children was the sire of Queen Freyda, making her Eric’s “vamp-neice”? It would possibly remove the complication of a Maker having control over a ruler (taking the assumption that a Grandsire wouldn’t inherit the control) but also give a reason why Appius was in Oklahoma with Alexei as Freyda would be of Appius and Alexei’s bloodline and maybe he was hoping that her connection would be enough to calm Alexei’s madness. This would be a mirror of Dermot and Claude’s desire to be around Sookie as her 1/8th Fae-ness is enough to make them feel better and more connected to their people, so Appius was possibily hoping that Freyda’s grandprogeny connection to himself would be enough to calm Alexei’s madness and when he found that it wasn’t (or that the effect didn’t last) he finally sought out Eric after over of hundred years of seperation to see if the more direct connection would be the answer. Anyway, this provides a connection between Eric and Freyda that would make him more likely to assist her should push come to shove.
As for a marriage between Eric and Freyda, I don’t want to see it happen for several reasons. #1 It would mean Eric was king of Louisiana and he has been clear that he doesn’t want that. #2 By being King he would have less time for Sookie, less freedom than he has even under Felipe and Sookie would become even more of a target for anyone who wanted to crush/take Louisiana and #3 by disolving Eric and Sookie’s vampire marriage to allow for a political union between Eric and Freyda it strips Sookie of the protection that her marriage gives her. As Eric’s wife she is, in theory, untouchable by other supes under pain of final death, but as his (for want of a better word) concubine she is not quite fair game, but of far, far less consequence in the vamp hierarchy as she no longer has the protection of the law of marriage and is merely a favoured human pet.
kitsunegari wrote
“As for a marriage between Eric and Freyda, I don’t want to see it happen for several reasons. #1 It would mean Eric was king of Louisiana and he has been clear that he doesn’t want that. #2 By being King he would have less time for Sookie, less freedom than he has even under Felipe and Sookie would become even more of a target for anyone who wanted to crush/take Louisiana and #3 by disolving Eric and Sookie’s vampire marriage to allow for a political union between Eric and Freyda it strips Sookie of the protection that her marriage gives her. As Eric’s wife she is, in theory, untouchable by other supes under pain of final death, but as his (for want of a better word) concubine she is not quite fair game, but of far, far less consequence in the vamp hierarchy as she no longer has the protection of the law of marriage and is merely a favoured human pet.”
Agreed. To me, in DitF, Eric made it clear he does not really favor the current vamp political system. He accepts it and is able to maneuver around in it, and as sheriff he found a good “medium,” but the higher up you get in the hierarchy the less the true payoff. Also, agree that though Victor is obviously trying to kill sookie (and probably eric), the marriage at least acts as a bit of a leash on him and others who would want to take or kill her. Even FDC respects the marriage custom enough to know that he can’t outright make Sookie go to Nevada.
I kept noticing the references to Texas in DITF, but I didn’t put it all together. Excellently done, Serena! It pains me to point out that this scenario sets up a parallel to SA, Threadgill, and Hadley. This is going to be the real test of Eric’s feelings for Sookie. I hope the Viking doesn’t let us down.
Thanks TAP, it did occur to me that you might have been one of the first to put it together. I hope the takeover doesn’t affect you much.
Oh and as for the parallel, it is looking like that, huh? Except Sookie has Niall in her pocket, hopefully there is a another solution available to her mortality as well as to her marriage.
When is part 2 going to be posted? My head is spinning…
Soonish, lol, I’m still working on it.
Hi, I just stumbled over this site recently but it has been a well of information, thank you so much! Normaly I don’t get into discussions like this but your post was so inspiring and gave so much food for thought that I just can’t help myself. So here goes… (I got so into this that I didn’t read the rules so please forgive any non-intended breaches of netiquette).
From all that has been written so far I would conclude that Freyda has already propositioned Eric with marriage, the offer coming through Appius. In my opinion Freyda offered Eric the kingdom of LA in return for his participation in an alliance against the Nevada dominion. He thought Eric would accept this offer, parents always want the best for their children, right, more power, money, etc. BUT Eric doesn’t want to accept the offer (for all the reasons Kitsunegari cited and more), that’s why he puts so much emphasis on Sookie being his wife and shares all sorts of information with her. He expects trouble.
And this trouble (for Sookie) could just as well come from Freyda. If she wants the marriage to consolidate her reign and sees Sookie as the only obstacle for a union with Eric, why, she has to get rid of her. Maybe Merlotte’s going up in flames is actually an assassination attempt? Staged as an accident (executed by oklahomian(?) daywalkers) because otherwise Eric might still refuse the offer of marriage or even retaliate to avange Sookie’s death.
I think there must be a prior connection between Freyda and Eric, I think she is an ex (which doesn’t exclude that he is her maker – see Pam). We haven’t meet many of those, right, despite Eric’s being portrayed as a quasi-sexaholic in the first few books (there’s Dawn, Pam, who else?). I just started rereading the books from the start and even though it was a long time ago, this Sookie-quote from DTTW seems significant in this context:
“It occurred to me that I was lethal for exes. I’d dusted Bill’s big love (and his mom); now I’d killed Alcide’s off-and-on-again sweetie. I knew hundreds of men. I’d never gone homicidal on their exes. But creatures I cared about, well, that seemed to be different. I wondered if Eric had any old girlfriends around. Probably about a hundred or so. Well, they’d better beware of me.”
So Freyda, beware! In my humble opinion one thread in the new book will be a kind of face-off between Freyda and Sookie (sort of like the Sookie-Debbie Pelt relationship only more strategic than vindictive on the part of Freyda). Somewhere else I read that people think the blood bond between Eric and Sookie will need to be broken in order for her to realize the strength of her feelings and really appreciated him. I think this might be true, on the other hand, Sookie is a fighter, will she let Eric marry someone else – as in give him a divorce – without a fight? I’m not sure. I think initially at least she will fight Freyda and maybe kill her but in the end some other part of the policial ubheavals in the Vampire world might separate her and Eric. Or he will be forced to do something that hurts her pride, her principles, etc. and they split.
On the positive side, in a way, the series might get boring if Eric and Sookie stay together without further struggles. So maybe they will part again for one or two books (and have passionated hate-fucks or make-up sex in between please). But in the end they have to be together! I refuse to believe otherwise. And after all, CH loves Eric, too!
You make an excellent case, Astrid.
I’m trying hard not to think about Sookie having to deal with another bitchy ex, but knowing Charlaine that’s how Freyda will turn out LOL.
I’m wondering about this too. I don’t believe that the “unpleasant business” Eric was mentioned to Sookie in DITF was to do with Alexei – Eric was already well aware by that point what a problem Appius had on his hands with him, and so was Sookie for that matter. There has to be a reason Appius was in Oklahoma before arriving in LA, that shit is NOT random. No way.
Hmm, I should have read the synopsis again first. “Firebombing” doesn’t sound accidental at all. I think I will have to rethink my assassination attempt theory. It just seemd to make sense. Sorry
Welcome Astrid! I will combine these comments for you
Thanks for saving me from embarrassment!
Looking forward to the next part of the post and more speculation about Book 11…
Just noticed a coincidence… say Eric does find himself poltically forced to marry OK’s queen, doesn’t that put Sook in the same predicament as her late cuz Hadley? Maybe someone mentioned this earlier and I missed it. Is CH known for recycling plots? By the way I’m a first time commenter but have been hovering around the site for a while, luv luv luv it!
Welcome tmitch
I think Renee mentioned further up that there is a definite parallel between Sookie/Eric/Freyda and Hadley/Sophie-Anne/Threadgill should this theory pan out.
Rather than recycling, Harris does draw parallels between characters and scenes – it’s a common device and it’s used extensively on True Blood, also.
Great post Serena. Do you think if Ms Harris is writing a short story about Sookie and Sam going to TX for Sam’s brother’s wedding that the wedding will also be featured in Dead Reconning? I was just over on facebook and read this on the CHfansite:
“For those of you who mentioned Quinn: THE SOOKIE COMPANION, on the shelves next February, featires an original novella about Sookie and Sam going to Sam’s brother’s wedding. Quinn is also in the story…July 7 at 8:14am”
Thanks Osterby!
Personally I think the wedding itself will be contained within the novella (unless CH chops it down to a ‘short story’, hmmm..) but Sookie and Sam’s trip might spill into Dead Reckoning, like if she gets kidnapped or something.
I still want to know how Quinn fits in, if he’s actually at the wedding or not.
Well, the fact that he works in event planning is awfully (maybe a little TOO) convenient. They don’t work exclusively with supes, either, so it could be that Quinn has a hand in coordinating, and shows up that way…
Can’t wait for the second installment, lady!!!
Yeah that is what I originally thought too, that he’d show up working for E (E) E, but SVB talked me out of that position, I don’t particularly remember why … Whatever! Lol, I’m blaming SVB! (again!)
I’m ‘perfecting’ part 2 as we speak.
I’ve been wicked sick and SVB’s been busy with RL, (cough cough .. betting on horsies), and stuff. LOL.
It should be up later today. Hopefully.
OH now I remember her reasoning… Quinn should have no involvement with a non-supe wedding, only Sam’s mom is a Shifter, Craig and Whatsherface (Wendy? IDK) are not Supes, and that is outside Quinn’s normal division of duties. And with that I agree, it would be odd that he all of a sudden takes up ‘human event planning.’
BUT, me thinks he could see the listing of non-Supe events that E (E) E is running, notices ‘Craig Merlotte’ on that list, puts 2 and 2 together and decides to crash the party. How does he know that Sookie is there? No idea, maybe he doesn’t and only wanted to approach Shifty Shifter Sam?
Anyway, I think it is convenient but for me there are some issues that need to be addressed in order for a perfect fit. *tries to quickly erase tire marks on SVB’s back* LOL.
True, very true. And Sam’s family didn’t seem too keen on the whole shifter thing either– but you never know, I guess.
Aww, I’ve been sick, too. Two weeks now, and the snots just won’t go away. NO LIKE.
OMG MAS, we must have the same thing! I’ve been a snot factory since the 25th, I think I’ve lost 10 pounds through my nose! LMAO!
Quinn. Damn! *grumbles to self*
I am new to this website and absolutely love it. I have reread the books a few times and now will have to read again because of all these new revelations. It is killing me that I am ignorant to a Queen Freyda. I thought I have read all the books and short stories. Did I read over her? Which book is she mentioned?
Freyda is mentioned a couple times in DITF littleonne.
Welcome to the site btw, I hope you enjoy
Definitely enjoying the site. I reread a couple of things in DITF and it makes so much more sense now. Where else is she mentioned? At the end Eric tells Sookie he is going to have to take care of Ocella’s dealings which probably means he contract marriage. Charlaine is a genius and I can not wait for her next book. She is Stephen King, Mary Higgins Clark and Danielle Steele or Jude Deveraux all wrapped up in one person.
I don’t remember her being mentioned earlier than DITF, but we think Freyda is the “new Queen on the board” mentioned in the Dead Reckoning (book 11) advanced summary.
“With her knack for being in trouble’s way, Sookie witnesses the firebombing of Merlotte’s, the bar where she works. Since Sam Merlotte is now known to be two-natured, suspicion falls immediately on the anti-shifters in the area. But Sookie suspects otherwise and she and Sam work together to uncover the culprit – and the twisted motive for the attack. But her attention is divided. Though she can’t ‘read’ vampires, Sookie knows her lover Eric Northman and his ‘child’ Pam well – and she realises that they are plotting to kill the vampire who is now their master. Gradually, she is drawn into the plot -which is much more complicated than she knows. Caught up in the politics of the vampire world, Sookie will learn that she is as much of a pawn as any ordinary human – and that there is a new Queen on the board . . .”
I found it in DITF when Eric is explaining to Sookie about vampire politics. And yes I think an offer has already been made through Ocella because Eric tells Sookie that one of the reasons Ocella has come is because of his ailing brother, but does not mention the other reason. Thanks for all of the great information!!!
Serena, I love and hate you for this post!
I love that you put the Texas connection together, I never picked up on that and I can’t believe I didn’t find this post until now. Did you ever do a part II?
First of all, I hate Sam. I feel like he has ulterior motive and I keep waiting for it to surface. I don’t know what it is and I can’t put my finger on it. He knows WAY too much.
For for the part I hate. Sookie and Eric. Now that we’ve read the first chapter of DR, could a takeover be the big thing coming? We know E/P are going to try and take out VM. Could a takeover be the ultimate motive? I think an ex of Eric would be a good thing for Sookie, shake her up a bit. She seems almost too comfortable with Eric at times. Make her realize how much she really does love Eric and how much he does for her.
I can’t help but think of Appius’ comment at the end of DITF, that she won’t keep Eric. And Serena also reminded us that he came from Oklahoma. Coincidence?! I think not! CH has a clever way of planting hints. I’m going to have to go back and reread DITF with this in mind.
If you never did a part II can you now? Pretty please Serena
Fret not Margo, I did
I sorta outlined what these implications could mean and how they’d take down Victor and FDC, as well as the necessary components to do so in this post here: http://www.sookieverseblog.com/2010/11/07/mordor-she-wrote/
I’m glad you liked it, btw.
[...] can’t discount Serena’s theory (outlined here and here) that the Big Bad Letter may have something to do with a political alliance with Freyda of [...]